Abstract

Drawing on a micro-phenomenological paradigm, we discuss Contact Improvisation (CI), where dancers explore potentials of intercorporeal weight sharing, kinesthesia, touch, and momentum. Our aim is to typologically discuss creativity related skills and the rich spectrum of creative resources CI dancers use. This spectrum begins with relatively idea-driven creation and ends with interactivity-centered, fully emergent creation: (1) Ideation internal to the mind, the focus of traditional creativity research, is either restricted to semi-independent dancing or remains schematic and thus open to dynamic specification under the partner’s influence. (2) Most frequently, CI creativity occurs in tightly coupled behavior and is radically emergent. This means that interpersonal synergies emerge without anybody’s prior design or planned coordination. The creative feat is interpersonally “distributed” over cascades of cross-scaffolding. Our micro-genetic data validate notions from dynamic systems theory such as interpersonal self-organization, although we criticize the theory for failing to explain where precisely this leaves skilled intentionality on the individuals’ part. Our answer is that dancers produce a stream of momentary micro-intentions that say “yes, and”, or “no, but” to short-lived micro-affordances, which allows both individuals to skillfully continue, elaborate, tweak, or redirect the collective movement dynamics. Both dancers can invite emergence as part of their playful exploration, while simultaneously bringing to bear global constraints, such as dance scores, and guide the collective dynamics with a set of specialized skills we shall term emergence management.

Highlights

  • Being Creative TogetherCreativity and interaction research can glean new concepts from careful qualitative research on creative events

  • We aim to bring together a couple of concise examples to delineate the spectrum of co-creation mechanisms that Contact Improvisation (CI) offers to the dancers

  • The data in our study suggest that in CI we are dealing with a continuum of weaker and stronger versions of interactive co-creation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Being Creative TogetherCreativity and interaction research can glean new concepts from careful qualitative research on creative events. The dancers explicated in minute detail what they perceived, thought, and planned in key creative moments. This first-person viewpoint, as well as the participatory experience of two of the authors (one of them with 25 years of CI experience), enables us to contrast different sources of embodied co-creation. The Interactive Turn in Creativity and Improvisation Research. Creativity is commonly defined as behavior that combines functionality and novelty [1]. The subject of study are inventors, mathematicians, musicians, scientists, designers, and artists [2,3,4,5,6]. An implicit assumption dominates here that generativity is internal to the mind (i.e., individual creative achievements are in focus)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call