Abstract

BackgroundMedical news that appears on newspaper front pages is intended to reach a wide audience, but how this type of medical news is prepared and distributed has not been systematically researched. We thus quantified the level of visibility achieved by front-page medical stories in the United States and analyzed their news sources.MethodologyUsing the online resource Newseum, we investigated front-page newspaper coverage of four prominent medical stories, and a high-profile non-medical news story as a control, reported in the US in 2007. Two characteristics were quantified by two raters: which newspaper titles carried each target front-page story (interrater agreement, >96%; kappa, >0.92) and the news sources of each target story (interrater agreement, >94%; kappa, >0.91). National rankings of the top 200 US newspapers by audited circulation were used to quantify the extent of coverage as the proportion of the total circulation of ranked newspapers in Newseum.FindingsIn total, 1630 front pages were searched. Each medical story appeared on the front pages of 85 to 117 (67.5%–78.7%) ranked newspaper titles that had a cumulative daily circulation of 23.1 to 33.4 million, or 61.8% to 88.4% of all newspapers. In contrast, the non-medical story achieved front-page coverage in 152 (99.3%) newspaper titles with a total circulation of 41.0 million, or 99.8% of all newspapers. Front-page medical stories varied in their sources, but the Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, New York Times and the Associated Press together supplied 61.7% of the total coverage of target front-page medical stories.ConclusionFront-page coverage of medical news from different sources is more accurately revealed by analysis of circulation counts rather than of newspaper titles. Journals wishing to widen knowledge of research news and organizations with important health announcements should target at least the four dominant media organizations identified in this study.

Highlights

  • Medical news coverage in newspapers plays an important role for both the public and medical professionals [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]

  • Front-page coverage of medical news from different sources is more accurately revealed by analysis of circulation counts rather than of newspaper titles

  • Story 3, dated Wednesday, October 17, 2007, reported research findings showing an increase in the number of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) cases in the US and was based on an article published in the Journal of the American Medical Association [21]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Medical news coverage in newspapers plays an important role for both the public and medical professionals [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Medical news that appears on newspapers’ front pages is intended to reach a wide audience and gain maximum or immediate attention. A practical approach would be to limit the analysis to particular medical topics or stories during a selected period in one country. Even previous studies evaluating newspaper coverage of certain medical topics in the US used limited and variable samples of newspapers ranging from the five highest-circulation newspapers to 36 high-circulation national and regional US newspapers [14,15,16,17,18]. Medical news that appears on newspaper front pages is intended to reach a wide audience, but how this type of medical news is prepared and distributed has not been systematically researched. We quantified the level of visibility achieved by front-page medical stories in the United States and analyzed their news sources

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call