Abstract

Abstract. We analyze the effect of varying East Asian (EA) sulfur emissions on sulfate concentrations in the Northern Hemisphere, using a global coupled oxidant-aerosol model (MOZART-2). We conduct a base and five sensitivity simulations, in which sulfur emissions from each continent are tagged, to establish the source-receptor (S-R) relationship between EA sulfur emissions and sulfate concentrations over source and downwind regions. We find that from west to east across the North Pacific, EA sulfate contributes approximately 80%–20% of sulfate at the surface, but at least 50% at 500 hPa. Surface sulfate concentrations are dominated by local anthropogenic sources. Of the sulfate produced from sources other than local anthropogenic emissions (defined here as "background" sulfate), EA sources account for approximately 30%–50% (over the Western US) and 10%–20% (over the Eastern US). The surface concentrations of sulfate from EA sources over the Western US are highest in MAM (up to 0.15 μg/m3), and lowest in DJF (less than 0.06 μg/m3). Reducing EA SO2 emissions will significantly decrease the spatial extent of the EA sulfate influence (represented by the areas where at least 0.1 μg m−3 of sulfate originates from EA) over the North Pacific both at the surface and at 500 hPa in all seasons, but the extent of influence is insensitive to emission increases, particularly in DJF and JJA. We find that EA sulfate concentrations over most downwind regions respond nearly linearly to changes in EA SO2 emissions, but sulfate concentrations over the EA source region increase more slowly than SO2 emissions, particularly at the surface and in winter, due to limited availability of oxidants (in particular of H2O2, which oxidizes SO2 to sulfate in the aqueous phase). We find that similar estimates of the S-R relationship for trans-Pacific transport of EA sulfate would be obtained using either sensitivity (i.e., varying emissions from a region to examine the effects on downwind concentrations) or tagging techniques. Our findings suggest that future changes in EA sulfur emissions may cause little change in the sulfate-induced health impact over downwind continents. However, SO2 emission reductions may significantly reduce the sulfate concentrations and the resulting negative radiative forcing over the North Pacific and the United States, thus providing a warming tendency.

Highlights

  • Sulfate aerosol is an important component of fine particulate matter (PM2.5, diameter ≤2.5 μm)

  • Since this study uses meteorological inputs from the NCEP reanalysis, we evaluate simulated aerosol concentrations by comparing the model results with various observations for sulfate, including the data collected by the Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science (RSMAS) at the University of Miami (Prospero, 1996) and by regional observation networks, namely the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) in the United States, the Cooperative Program for Monitoring and Evaluation of the Longrange Transmission of Air Pollutants in Europe (EMEP: http://www.emep.int), and the East Asian Monitoring Network (EANET: http://www.eanet.cc)

  • Using our tagged regional sulfur tracers we identify a direct change in EA sulfate concentrations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sulfate aerosol is an important component of fine particulate matter (PM2.5, diameter ≤2.5 μm). Sulfate aerosols scatter sunlight, reduce visibility, affect regional climate, and harm ecosystems (Gunther, 1992; Giorgi et al, 2003; Park et al, 2004; Marmer et al, 2007; Koch et al, 2007a). Since oxidation of SO2 leads to the production of sulfate aerosols and contributes to acid deposition, many industrialized nations have stringently regulated SO2 emissions to protect human health and ecosystems (Dutkiewicz et al, 2000; Moldan et al, 2001). The benefits of sulfur emission control partly depend on the linearity of the source-receptor (S-R) relationship between SO2 emissions and sulfate concentrations (Oppenheimer et al, 1985; Dutkiewicz et al, 2000). The relationship between SO2 emissions and sulfate concentrations is linear near minor SO2 sources, but nonlinear near

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call