Abstract
An extensive field campaign was carried out in Florence (Tuscany) to investigate the PM2.5 composition and to identify its sources. The scientific objective of this study is providing a reliable source apportionment, which is mandatory for the application of effective mitigation actions. Particulate matter (PM) was collected for one year, simultaneously in a traffic site, in an urban background, and in a regional background site. While the use of two filter types (quartz and Teflon) allowed obtaining a comprehensive chemical characterization (elemental and organic carbon, ions, elements) by the application of different analytical techniques, the location of the three sampling sites allowed getting a better separation among local, urban, regional and transboundary sources. During shorter periods, the aerosol was also collected by means of a streaker sampler and PIXE (Particle Induced X-ray Emission) analysis of these samples allowed the assessment of hourly resolution elemental time trends. Positive matrix factorisation (PMF) identified seven main sources: traffic, biomass burning, secondary sulphate, secondary nitrates, urban dust, Saharan dust and marine aerosol. Traffic mass concentration contributions were found to be strong only at the traffic site (~8 μg·m−3, 33% of PM2.5). Biomass burning turned out to be an important PM2.5 source in Florence (~4 μg·m−3), with very similar weights in both city sites while at the regional background site its weight was negligible. Secondary sulphate is an important PM2.5 source on a regional scale, with comparable values in all three sites (~3.5 μg·m−3). On average, the contribution of the “natural” components (e.g., mineral dust and marine aerosols) to PM2.5 is moderate (~1 μg·m−3) except during Saharan dust intrusions where this contribution is higher (detected simultaneously in all three sites). High-time resolution data confirmed and reinforced these results.
Highlights
Particulate matter (PM) represents a serious pollution problem in many urban sites.High population densities in urban areas and related activities result in increased PM emissions, which in turn lead to higher ambient concentrations and greater exposure to them
Smaller particles are more harmful than larger ones as they get deeper inside the respiratory system and clear relationships have been observed between exposure to
PM2.5 daily mass concentrations in the three sampling sites are shown in Figure 1, while average daily mass concentrations in the three sampling sites are shown in Figure 1, while average
Summary
Particulate matter (PM) represents a serious pollution problem in many urban sites.High population densities in urban areas and related activities result in increased PM emissions, which in turn lead to higher ambient concentrations and greater exposure to them. According to different studies of the World Health Organization [3], exposure to PM can cause or aggravate cardiovascular and lung diseases, heart attacks and arrhythmias. It can affect the central nervous system, the reproductive system and cause cancer. Smaller particles are more harmful than larger ones as they get deeper inside the respiratory system and clear relationships have been observed between exposure to PM2.5 and adverse health effects [4]: as a result, PM2.5 is an air pollution metric widely used to assess air quality, with the EU having set targets for reduction in PM2.5 levels and population exposure (EU directive 2008/EC/50)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
