Abstract
In this study, quasi-UFP (PM0.25, dp < 0.25 μm) were collected for 24 h once per week from April 2008 to March 2009 at 10 different locations in the Los Angeles Basin. Samples were chemically analyzed and organic constituents of PM0.25 were grouped into polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs), hopanes and steranes, n-alkanes, and levoglucosan, with concentration levels ranging from 0.16 to 5.5, 0.09 to 2.2, 9.3 to 48, and 2.2 to 106.2 ng m−3 over all sites and seasons, respectively. A molecular marker-based chemical mass balance (MM-CMB) model was applied to estimate the relative contributions from the following primary sources: mobile sources (combined gasoline and diesel vehicles), wood smoke, natural gas combustion, vegetative detritus, and ship emissions. Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) tracers were not included in the model; however their contributions were estimated from non-biomass burning water soluble organic carbon (WSOCnb) and un-apportioned OC from MM-CMB model (“other OC”). High correlation (R2 = 0.8) between “other OC” and WSOCnb in summer suggests that “other OC” is highly impacted by SOA, however un-apportioned primary sources may contribute to “other OC” as well. Mobile sources were expectedly the major primary contributor to PM0.25, with seasonal average contributions of 31 ± 12% in summer and 57 ± 17% in winter. “Other organic matter” was the second largest contributor to PM0.25 in all seasons, across the basin, with substantially higher contribution during warmer spring and summer seasons (27%), while lowest during cold seasons (13%). Wood smoke was the third major contributor to PM0.25 in winter, whereas its contribution was lowest in summer. As expected, ship emissions displayed the highest contribution at the near-harbor HUD site, and their levels continually decreased as a function of distance from coast. Two other primary sources, vegetative detritus and natural gas combustion, collectively contributed to 1.3 ± 0.8% of PM0.25 on an annual average basis over all sites. Comparison of our results to PM2.5 OC apportionment, conducted at central LA, shows that contribution of mobile sources to PM0.25 OC is more than two times higher than PM2.5 (75% and 30%, respectively), while “other OC” contributed significantly higher to PM2.5 OC compared to PM0.25 (56% and 21%, respectively).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.