Sound Quality and Speech Reception for Prescribed Hearing Aid Frequency Responses

Abstract

Four different prescriptions of hearing aid insertion gain versus frequency were validated with a group of 26 moderately hearing-impaired, elderly hearing aid users. Three prescriptions were based on calculating the loudness and articulation index (AI) for aided speech, and ranged from a frequency response with moderate high-frequency emphasis, restoring normal loudness for speech peaks, to a response with the greatest high-frequency emphasis, maximizing the AI. The fourth prescription was a well-established formula of the half-gain type. The frequency responses were evaluated by paired comparison ratings of the pleasantness and intelligibility of speech in noise, and by speech identification tests in noise. The subjects rated the flattest response as significantly more pleasant than the other responses, and significantly more intelligible than the prescription with maximal high-frequency emphasis. There were no detectable differences in signal/noise ratios required for 50% speech identification. These results indicate that a prescription that restores normal loudness for speech peaks in each critical band is probably more easily accepted than either a procedure which is intended to make all speech bands equally loud, or a prescription which maximizes the AI.