Abstract
This paper proposes to study the place of history in sociological analysis of Durkheim and Gokalp. The founder of the French sociology has a complex relationship to history. He endeavors to lay in Regles , the basis of a new discipline and criticize severely the historical method. Thus, in this book, he shows certain reluctance to history, but he don't reject categorically the place of historical method in sociological analysis. In order to obtain autonomy for sociology, he contrasts two traditions of analysis of the social world: the chronological history and philosophy of history. However, Durkheim believes the possibility or even the necessity of a history made sociologically. As for Gokalp, disciple of Durkheim, he endeavors, on the one hand, to establish sociology as an autonomous discipline in Turkey and, on the other hand, resorts to history to seek the rudiments of the nascent Turkish nationalism. This delicate undertaking of Gokalp, founding father of Turkish sociology and ideologue of Turkish nationalism, is the main purpose of this paper.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
