Abstract
ABSTRACT In the United States, the marriage of minors remains legal in 40 of 50 states despite evidence that the practice often leads to the physical, sexual, and emotional abuse of girls. As a political issue, child marriage has failed to capture the attention of the public or media. Yet, over the past six years, a majority of state legislatures have put marriage age reforms on their legislative agendas, in some cases leading to policy adoption of a child marriage ban. Using archival data from 50 states and in-depth interviews, I argue that the advocacy of a small group of child marriage survivors precipitated progress on marriage age reforms. I find that legislators responded positively to narratives given by child marriage survivors and expressed a paternal need to protect girls. I also examine the limitations of placing survivors of traumatic life experiences at the forefront of policy action. This article contributes to our knowledge of how gender justice issues rise to the legislative agenda and how certain overlooked issues require a high level of personal traumatic disclosure to gain attention.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.