Sophisticated Hate Stratagems: Unpacking the Era of Distrust

Abstract

Over the past decade, the rise of political extremism and its associated linguistic expression resulted in communication companies’ decisions to restrict hate speech and, in many cases, ban speech emanating from specific users. Before we attempt to regulate expression per se—whether through “cancelling” expression, “deplatforming” speakers through suspensions or platform restrictions, rewriting social media terms of service, or criminalizing harmful speech—we should seek a clearer understanding of how hate appeals are used to accomplish particular communication purposes. In this analysis, we analyze hate speech as a stratagem—an artifice or trick of war—used with great effect during the 2020 election. Our concern is how this tactic is used to harm the body politic, reducing citizen ability to engage with divergent publics and points of view, and threatening democratic rule. Critically, we must understand how communication on social media platforms is being used to destabilize the communication environment and prevent the robust discussion of ideas in a public forum, a prerequisite for democratic governance.