Abstract

Birds communicate their motivation and willingness to escalate a territorial conflict with a variety of agonistic signals. One of these, song-type switching, has been suggested to be a conventional signal in male–male interactions. However, this behavior does not show a consistent pattern across species. In this study, we asked whether variation in song-switching rate carries a message for song receivers among territorial chaffinches, Fringilla coelebs. Chaffinch song is well described, but only a few studies have focused on the communicative function of song-type switching or bout duration. Using data from playback experiments, we show here that variation in song-type switching rate affects the response of chaffinches. In response to the low switching rate treatment, territorial males began to sing later, produced fewer songs and more rain calls, decreased flight intensity, and spent more time close to the speaker than during playback of songs with a high switching rate. Our results provide strong evidence that the song-type switching rate is an agonistic signal in the chaffinch and that territorial males exhibit a stronger response toward rivals that sing with a lower song-type switching rate. A secondary purpose of our study was to determine the receivers’ response with respect to their own song rate and song repertoire. We found that the reaction of tested males was correlated with their own spontaneous song rate. This implies that a male’s response to stimuli may be predicted on the basis of his own song output.Significance statementUsing playback experiments, we show that birds’ responses to simulated territorial intrusion vary not only with the type of stimulus but also with the tested males’ spontaneous song output. We found that, from the perspective of the song receiver, variation in switching rate carries a message for territorial chaffinches. Our findings add a new example of agonistic signaling in which territorial males exhibit a stronger response toward rivals singing with lower song-type switching rate, which up to now has only been demonstrated in a few species. Moreover, our results show that a male’s response to playback could be predicted using his song output. This may be associated with motivation and willingness to escalate a conflict and could possibly also indicate a male’s quality.

Highlights

  • Birdsong carries important information that is utilized both in mating and agonistic behavior (Catchpole and Slater 2008)

  • The present study aimed to address the following two questions: (1) Do song-type switching rates carry a message in male– male interactions in the chaffinch? (2) Do differences in song production rate and repertoire size among males lead to differences in their responses to territorial intrusion? To answer these questions, we conducted a playback experiment on a local population of chaffinches that inhabit forest patches in an urbanized landscape

  • We found that song-type switching rate evoked different responses from chaffinch males during simulated male–male interactions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Birdsong carries important information that is utilized both in mating and agonistic behavior (Catchpole and Slater 2008). In addition to repertoire size (Balsby et al 2017; Byers 2017), song performance parameters such as frequency matching (Morton and Young 1986; Horn et al 1992), soft song (Hof and Hazlett 2010; Jakubowska and Osiejuk 2018), vocal performance (Moseley et al 2013; Phillips and Derryberry 2017), or song-type matching (Krebs et al 1981; King and McGregor 2016) can play a role during aggressive interactions by birds Another aspect of birdsong that can serve as an agonistic signal in aggressive contexts is song-type switching (Vehrencamp 2000; Searcy and Beecher 2009), which is used by songbirds that possess a repertoire of different song types. Other proposed hypotheses suggest that song-type switching is an outcome of sexual selection for repertoire size and that switching between song types during vocal interactions carries a message to the receiver (Catchpole and Slater 2008; Brumm et al 2009)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call