Abstract

This article examines 'Song of Myself' as, in Whitman's own words, a " language experiment.' Whitman's poetry struck contemporaries like Charles Eliot Norton as a strange "compound' or mixture of high and low styles: of New England transcendentalism and "New York rowdyism.' In this article, I argue that such linguistic mixtures function not as the sign of "democratic' fusion or 'heteroglossia,' but of class antagonism. Whitman's strategy of juxtaposing elevated and common languages is the legacy of his involvement with the radical-democratic 'Locofoco' movement of the 1830s, political activity in which he attacked aristocratic pretension and rights of ownership. The article examines a series of linguistic-political clashes in 'Song of Myself': between the languages of Concord transcendentalism and carpentry, Augustan decorum and sensational fiction, opera and urban insurrection. Whitman's satiric intent is to deflate the high and elevate the low, but his position is made problematic by his position as a lower-middle-class autodidact: while he wants to ridicule elite culture he also needs its glow of distinction.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.