Abstract

abstractSouth Africa’s Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Freedom Charter are globally ground-breaking for providing provisions of non-discrimination, and, of particular note, on the basis of sexual orientation. Since the introduction of these protective frameworks, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and queer (LGBTIQ) communities, allies, and advocates in the country have won major legal battles on these issues; however, in spite of these successes, LGBTIQ communities continue to face hostility and violence. As a result, South African LGBTIQ individuals often travel to urban centres, such as Johannesburg, in the hope that these spaces will be more tolerant of their sexual orientation and gender identity; the reality, however, suggests otherwise. Moreover, despite South Africa’s designation as a safe haven for LGBTIQ communities, migrants from other African countries — where same-sex relationships are criminalised — are overwhelmingly met with xenophobic verbal, emotional, physical, and political violence. This article describes the authors’ engagement with nine lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) migrants and asylum seekers from Zimbabwe, Malawi, and elsewhere in South Africa during a weeklong poetry workshop exploring their lived experiences in Johannesburg. This workshop followed a body mapping and narrative writing workshop held previously with the same participants. This article investigates the themes identified from the body mapping process that guided the poems produced: migration, violence, citizenship, and freedom. The poetry created during the workshop illuminates how lesbian, gay, and bisexual migrants in Johannesburg work on a daily basis to build social trust as they demand to be seen and recognised, to enact their rights, to make and remake homes, to show up in public as Black people, as LGB individuals, and as human beings. We explore these strategies of citizen-making as informed by the LGB poets with whom we had the opportunity to work.

Highlights

  • South Africa’s Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Freedom Charter are globally groundbreaking for providing provisions of non-discrimination

  • South Africa’s Refugee Act, first drafted in 1998, “at a time when the South African commitment to rights was strengthened by the memory of the abuses of apartheid” (MoVE, 2016:16) incorporates progressive provisions for individuals to apply for asylum on the basis of violence and/or, persecution, or fear of such, associated with their sexual orientation and gender identity

  • This article draws on work undertaken as part of the MoVE:method:visual:explore project3, coordinated by the second and third author, based at the African Centre for Migration & Society (ACMS) at the University of the Witwatersrand

Read more

Summary

Introduction

South Africa’s Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Freedom Charter are globally groundbreaking for providing provisions of non-discrimination. The Refugee Act no 130 of 1998 technically provides an opportunity of safety for individuals who experience criminalisation and discrimination in their countries of origin, in reality, the implementation of this progressive legislation is fraught with inconsistencies and weak implementation. Research suggests that a successful application on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity is unlikely (Middleton, 2009; Palmary, 2009; Palmary et al, 2010) Reasons for this include “corruption to inaccessibility of the system to appallingly poor decision making by the Refugee Status Determination Officers” (MoVE, 2016:16)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call