Abstract

ABSTRACT This essay draws on new research into the notion of the “inconstant” lover, a label that is (mis)applied to women by male authors or male characters in literature, to suggest that when women writers choose to depict wayward, fickle women in amorous affairs, this representation becomes subversive. This argument is illustrated with a reading of Mary Shelley’s “The Bride of Modern Italy” and Valperga. My contention is that the criticism directed at Clorinda and Beatrice respectively presents a distorted view of reality controlled by a patriarchal system in which male figures are judged differently. The fates of these protagonists foreshadow twentieth-century women writers’ exploration of the hapless woman’s feminine power. The Shelleys’ collaborative literary relationship indicates their discourse on this topic; we can examine the wilful male poet-figure in verse but also the severe misfortune of Beatrice Cenci and Mary Shelley’s appreciation of her story. The essay takes as its departure point a passage in Jane Austen’s Persuasion (“songs and proverbs, all talk of woman’s fickleness”), and two art exhibitions on display in 2022. The argument concludes by connecting the Shelleys’ representation of the inconstant woman with the treatment of the theme in twentieth- and twenty-first-century poetry, prose, and film.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.