Abstract

Black teenagers viewed a series of drawings depicting verbal encounters between two figures. These drawings were administered by either a black or a white experimenter and were accompanied by dialogue and instructions presented in either standard English or black dialect. Transcriptions of subjects’ responses were rated on a set of evaluative dimensions by both experienced nonprofessional (probation officers) and inexperienced professional (English teachers) judges. Subjects’ responses to black dialect were substantially longer and were given more favorable ratings than their responses to standard English. In general, experienced nonprofessionals gave more favorable ratings to subjects’ responses than did inexperienced professionals. These latter judges in turn gave more favorable ratings to responses to drawings accompanied by standard English when these drawings portrayed situations in which English dialogue was appropriate than when they did not. Results provide evidence for a “difference” hypothesis a...

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.