Abstract
Abstract Since the development of a contact value theorem by Henderson et al. it has been known that the prediction of the venerable Gouy–Chapman (GC) theory for the contact value of the density profile of an electrolyte near an electrode is incorrect. The more recent semi-empirical work of Fawcett and Henderson and the simulations of Boda and Henderson have shown that the contact value of the charge profile at low electrode charge is also given incorrectly by the GC theory, at least for a binary symmetric restricted primitive model electrolyte. In the present study we examine the contact values of the profiles of the double layer formed by the electrolyte species in a binary symmetric restricted primitive model electrolyte as a function of the electrode charge by means of simulation. It is difficult to extract detailed information from simulation values of the density and charge profiles at large electrode charge because the contact values of these profiles are dominated by the large quadratic term in the electrode charge. However, we find from our simulations for a fairly wide range of concentrations and electrode charges, that the product of the counterion and coion profiles is a sensitive probe with which to study the double layer because it is a direct test of the basis of the GC approximation that the counterion and coion profiles are exponentials of ± zeψ ( x )/ kT and so have a product that is identically one. We find that this product is not one or even a constant as the electrode charge is varied and, thus, the GC contact values do not agree even qualitatively with the simulation results. In contrast, the modified Poisson–Boltzmann theory is quite successful in accounting for the behavior of this product.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.