Abstract

The common formulations of 'some say p and some say q' (and the related variations) reflect the compositional relationships between the four pragmatic premises that I initially presented: 'Some' as a formula, which diminishes the quantitative weight of those holding a position; the commutativity of 'and'; the pragmatic non-commutativity of 'but'; and the possibility of replacing 'but' by 'and'. These premises underlie halakhic decision rules discussed by R. Malachi HaCohen Montefoscoli (1695-1772) of Livorno and previous sources which he brings in his classic book Yad Malachi (Livorno, 1766-1767). This exemplifies a broader phenomenon: certain parts of the halakhic rules literature include rules that embody pragmatic assumptions. Because the rules of interpretation consist of a higher linguistic awareness than that of everyday discourse, pragmatic analysis of these rules may enrich pragmatics as a whole, with insights they raise from ancient sources, even if not formulated as part of a full-fledged pragmatic study.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.