Abstract

Since results in the literature show that series of patients with kidney cancer on hemodialysis present at the postmortem examination an incidence of metastases significantly lower than such patients not on hemodialysis, the author asks what part of this favorable prognostic result is due to the dialysis membrane and what part is due to the immune system. The part due to the dialysis membrane is with every probability a blockade of metastatic cancer cells. This block, very likely consequent to phenomena of adhesion of cells to the dialysis membrane, allows a selection in that it blocks those cells that have the greatest possibility of adhesion also to the endothelium of capillaries in sites of potential colonization. The immune system would thus have, in the presence of the dialysis membrane, a greater possibility to concentrate its action on residual metastatic cells, even though uremia can have a negative influence on the clinical result. The possibility is discussed that among the various therapies of neoplasms, that for melanoma in particular may benefit from the presence of the dialysis membrane. Melanoma has demonstrated a certain sensitivity to the action of cytokines, in part also due to the presence of receptors for the latter in melanoma cells. However, the early and intense metastatic diffusion worsens the prognosis in the course of the neoplasm, and an eventual blockade, although partial, of metastatic cells could thus lead to a positive clinical result. An increase in cytokines, verified in patients on hemodialysis, does not appear to have any particular affect on the course of the disease. No signs of particular activity of the cytokines most active in an antineoplastic sense or in the sense of immune tolerance have been observed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call