Abstract

Most publications considering error in geochemical prospecting data attempt to measure analytical precision, while making no effort to measure sampling and sub-sampling error. Using the fact that the variance of the distribution of the total error is the sum of the variances of the various contributory errors, a method for apportioning error to the different causes is described. An example using data obtained from a geochemical prospecting research project illustrates the value of the approach in that the major source of error is found to be in the sampling rather than the analysis.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call