Some problems inherent in transport studies in synaptosomes.

Abstract

Abstract—A technique utilizing a 30‐place manifold has been developed to study synaptosomal transport; some problems associated with such studies have been identified and clarified. The time course of L‐glutamic acid uptake has been used to test variations in experimental protocol.Synaptosomes apparently become increasingly labile with increased time of incubation. This is indicated by a drop in the curve of uptake vs time after 8–12 min. Ninety seven to 98% of the glutamate taken up from a 10−6m solution is released by osmotic shock.Synaptosomes can be stored in 0.32 m ice‐cold sucrose suspension for periods up to 50 min without decline in measured uptake. Storage for 3 h or more results in a very substantial decline in measured uptake. Neither the decline in measured uptake with time, nor the decline with storage, is prevented by increasing the osmolarity of the solutions used or by use of synaptosomes from the initial 1085 g supemate rather than after sedimentation and resuspension. Although prewarming synaptosomes at 30°C for 20 min prior to their use lessened or eliminated the decline following peak uptake, the difference between stored and non‐stored synaptosomes was not improved. Uptake was also much less when synaptosomes were used from the first supernate or when warmed prior to their use. Storage of tissue prior to homogenization resulted in synaptosomes that gave minimal reductions in measured uptake.Washing synaptosomes after separation from incubation medium resulted in a variable loss of substrate radioactivity, depending on such variables as brand of filter, pore size, composition of wash solution, and temperature of wash solution. The results support the hypothesis that washing causes lysis of a portion of the synaptosomes. However, with Millipore filters (0.45 μm) and a 30°C Krebs‐Henseleit wash solution, the loss caused by washing is minimized (about 15%).Measured uptake is found to depend on the type of filter used. Uptake is much greater with Millipore 0.45 pm filters than with Gelman 0.45 μm filters. Use of Nuclepore (0.4 μm) filters results in measured uptakes only about 5% of that when Millipore 0.45 μm filters are used. With Millipore filters, 0.30 μm pore size filters gave uptakes only 68% of that using 0.45 pm pore size filters.