Some Practical Aspects of Invalidity of Procedures for Determining the Supplier (Contractor, Provider) and State (Municipal) Contract

Abstract

The Federal statute аbout the contract system contains rules allowing invalidating the definition of a supplier (contractor, performer), as well as a contract. In the course of the civil law reform, significant changes were made to the rules on deal. In particular, a deal concluded in violation of the requirements of a law or other legal act became, as a general rule, disputed. The change in the legislator's approach to invalid deal naturally affected the courts application of invalidity rules to state and municipal contracts. In the same cases, contracts are considered both void and unquestionable. The authors set a task to analyze the practice of applying the rules on the invalidity of deals to state and municipal contracts, as well as the procedures for determining the supplier (contractor, provider) in order to identify existing trends and form the most objective approach when making decisions on the invalidity of contracts. The article concludes that state and municipal contracts can be challenged on most grounds, as well as the need to identify the feasibility and validity of applying invalidity as a way to protect the violated rights of subjects of the contract system.