Abstract
It is suggested in the article that exclusivity should be added to the definition of the real property right; the following clauses should be revised: the definition of the real property right, the competency of evidence of the register of immovables, the effectiveness of the bona fide protection of real property registration, the tort liabilities of the registration authority, possession reformulation, state ownership of water resources and wildlife resources and public utilities, bona fide acquisition, transfer of contracting and operational rights, and mortgage. The following provisions should be added: the ownership of religious property, the acquisitive prescription, and the pledge on business. It is also suggested that the provisions on claims in rem prescribed in Article 39 and Article 42 be deleted, and the provision on dwelling rights, that is, Chapter XV, also be deleted.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.