Abstract
Present trends in the evolution of the design and interpretations of bioequivalency studies are reviewed. It is suggested that, although such tests are now being increasingly regarded as clinical mirrors rather than simply quality control tests for final product testing, there is still the possibility of simplifying such procedures. However, care must be exercised to ensure that changes in bioequivalency tests are introduced only after careful public discussions, which should involve both regulators and pharmaceutical scientists from academia and industry. Further, it is important that bioequivalency standards shall be internally consistent and applied in a politically neutral manner.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
