Abstract

The Model assisted estimators are approximately design unbiased, consistent and provides robustness in the case of large sample sizes. The model assisted estimators result in reduction of the design variance if underlying model reasonably defines the regression relationship. If the model is misspecified, then model assisted estimators might result in an increase of the design variance but remain approximately design unbiased and show robustness against model-misspecification. The well-known model assisted estimators, generalized regression estimators are members of a larger class of calibration estimators. Calibration method generates calibration weights that meet the calibration constraints and have minimum distance from the sampling design weights. By using different distance measures, classical calibration approach generates different calibration estimators but with asymptotically identical properties. The constraint of distance minimization was reduced for studying the properties of calibration estimators by proposing a simple functional form approach. The approach generates calibration weights that prove helpful to control the changes in calibration weights by using different choices of auxiliary variable’s functions. This paper is an extended work on model assisted approach by using functional form of calibration weights. Some new model assisted estimators are considered to get efficient and stabilized regression weights by introducing a control matrix. The asymptotic un-biasedness of the proposed estimators is verified and the expressions for MSE are derived in three different cases. A simulation study is done to compare and evaluate the efficiency of the proposed estimators with some existing model assisted estimators.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThey named the weights wk , the calibration weights because these weights have minimum distance from the survey design weights and satisfy a calibration to benchmark constraints:

  • 3-Simulation Study: We examine and compare the performance of the proposed estimators tNCALF1, tNCALF2 and tNCALF3 defined in (2.5), (2.7) and (2.9) respectively through a simulation study with classical Horvitz Thompson estimator and with the special case of the functional form calibration estimator proposed by Estevao &Särndal (2000, 2002) defined in (1.9)

  • For the case of two auxiliary variables when one is weakly correlated with the response variable the tNCALF2 again produces the minimum bias and Mean Square Error (MSE), the reason may be that control matrix assign weights to the sampling errors of the auxiliary variables that are proportional to their correlation with the study variable and second auxiliary variable get less weight as compared to the first variable in generation of calibration weights and in estimation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

They named the weights wk , the calibration weights because these weights have minimum distance from the survey design weights and satisfy a calibration to benchmark constraints:. To study the properties of calibration estimators in general, Estevao and Särndal (2000) proposed a functional form of calibration weights. They proposed weights wkCALF that had mathematical form and by defining two parameters produce different weight systems. Due to the flexibility and formation of the functional form calibration weights, these can helpful to control the undesirable effects of auxiliary variables by using different choices of qk and zk .The functional form of calibration estimator tCALF defined in (1.9) is a linear function of the design weights and the adjustment term. Breidt (2017) used the model-assisted approach from a complex survey together with auxiliary information to estimate finite population parameters. The asymptotic properties of these estimators were developed and assessed

The New Functional Form of Calibration Weights
Result
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call