Abstract

The objective of this paper is to emphasise the role played by particular structures in the solution of some control problems. The so-called “structural approach” relies on various indicators of dynamical systems such as, for instance, finite and infinite zeros, kernel indices, …. The fundamental invariance properties of these structures under the action of some transformations groups (e.g. feedback) are at the origin of their key role. Structural solutions to “classical” control problems, such as disturbance rejection, model matching and non-interaction are now rather well known: zeros at infinity play a role in the existence of “proper” solutions, while finite (invariant) zeros allow for the characterisation of “fixed poles”, whose location in the complex plane gives answer to pole placement limitations (including stability). Among the recent contributions to this structural approach, a particular attention is here devoted to: - “Partial” versions of some of these control problems: The control objective only concerns a finite number of (and not necessarily all) the first Markov parameters of the transfer function matrix of the controlled system (e.g. to be zero for disturbance rejection or model matching, to be diagonal for non-interaction). Some interesting new issues in the dual context of failure detection are also sketched. - Generalised solutions: Based on proportional and derivative feedback laws, with new issues in the context of systems with variable internal structures, and also for systems with delays. Geometric concepts, such as invariant and almost invariant subspaces, and algebraic counterparts, such as factorisations on some special rings, are intermediary tools which support the characterisations of those particular structures and which allow for a structural treatment of the considered control and/or observation problems. The results are here presented without proof: references are given to previous published results (in most cases in books and journals which are easily available), and some simple examples are used to illustrate non-standard notions (among which systems with variable internal structure, and time domain left invertibility). Most of the results here presented rely on long and intensive collaborations between the author and various colleagues.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.