Abstract

In this paper we investigate the performance of completion theorem provers on a number of group theoretic problems. These are of a rather different character to the usual test problems and exercise different features of the programs. Very large rewriting systems and very deeply nested terms arise, but, where the programs allow, additional mathematical information can often by used to dramatically speed the computations. We compare two general-purpose theorem provers with some more specialised tools and conclude by drawing some lessons for the design of future general-purpose provers.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call