Some genetic implications of maternal effects—an hypothesis of mammalian growth

Abstract

In a cross-breeding experiment involving all types of matings among Friesian, Ayrshire and Jersey cattle, the effect of maternal size has been investigated, based on various comparisons of reciprocal crosses, using data on weight and body size from birth to 2 years of age. Among the thirteen characters analysed, there was a close relationship at I month old between the relative maturity of the characters and the relative extent of their maternal effects. This relationship showed that the more mature characters were the least affected by the maternal environment. Cross-bred calves out of a mother of the larger breed were larger at birth than the reciprocal crosses but in all cases this difference disappeared during the first year's growth.The early expression of the offspring's genotype for body size depended on whether prenatal growth had been favoured or restricted by the maternal environment within limits. Maternal retardation of growth resulted in neonatal phenotypes closely related to their genetic ranking for mature body size, whereas early expression of the genotype is obscured by lavish prenatal conditions.A mammalian growth model is presented and the results are interpreted in terms of this model. The explanation assumes that temporary advantage is taken, during growth, of variations in the environment, when the latter exceeds a minimal level demanded by the genotype for stable development to normal mature size. This supply and demand hypothesis of growth is discussed in terms of its implications for genetic selection of different types of body characters. The main conclusion is that an understanding of the early environment, particularly the maternal one, may permit selection for some adult characteristics to be carried out at an early age.