Abstract
Reactions offered here (a) urge rethinking on the adequacy of a widely used criterion for defining hearing handicap in view of data referenced in the subject report, (b) criticize the author's evaluations basic to estimating hearing loss risk from known levels of noise exposure and recommending safe limits for hearing, and (c) question the use of proposed complex schemes for rating noise hazards to hearing as derived from presumed relationships between temporary and permanent noise-induced threshold shifts in hearing.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
