Some Features of Termination of Rowers of the Chairman of the Court of General Jurisdiction

Abstract

The derivative nature of the legal status of the president of the court from the status of a judge in general requires the establishment of certain correspondences in the mechanisms for its acquisition and termination. At the same time, the existence of disciplinary and other liability of court presidents for non-performance of their duties leads to an arbitrary interpretation and application of existing legal norms established at the level of legislative and subordinate acts. The article supports the idea of appointing presidents of courts from among persons with judicial status. The options for terminating the powers of the chairman of the court are considered: automatic suspension or termination in the event of suspension or termination of their powers as judges of the respective courts; reaching the age limit for office; voluntary resignation while retaining the powers of a judge; early termination of powers of the chairman of the court with the preservation of the position of judge in connection with the failure to perform or improper performance of his official duties.