Abstract
We address several types of decision questions related to context-free languages when an NPDA is given as input. First we consider the question of whether the NPDA makes a bounded number of stack reversals (over all accepting inputs) and show that this problem is undecidable even when the NPDA is only 2-ambiguous. We consider the same problem for counter machines (i.e., whether the counter makes a bounded number of reversals) and show that it is also undecidable. On the other hand, we show that the problem is decidable for unambiguous NPDAs even when augmented with reversal-bounded counters. Next, we look at problems of equivalence, containment and disjointness with fixed languages. With the fixed language L0 being one of the following: P = $\{ x \# x^r | $x∈(0+1)* }, Pu = $\{ x x^r | $x∈(0+1)* }, Dk = Dyck language with k-type of parentheses, or Sk = two-sided Dyck language with k types of parentheses, we consider problems such as: 'Is L(M)∩L0 = ∅?', 'Is L(M)⊆L0?', or 'Is L(M) = L0?', where M is an input NPDA (or a restricted form of it). For example, we show that the problem, 'Is L(M)∩P?', is undecidable when M is a deterministic one-counter acceptor, while the problem 'Is L(M)⊆P?' is decidable even for NPDAs augmented with reversal-bounded counters. Another result is that the problem 'Is L(M)⊆Pu?' is decidable in polynomial time for M an NPDA. We also show several other related decidability and undecidability results.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.