Abstract
The paper looks at some issues with how forensic examinations are classified, commissioned and conducted. Analysis of scientific literature reveals that the diversity of new and emerging forensic science disciplines puts the questions of their classification at odds with current practice. The author highlights some of these contradictions and offers solutions to issues arising in the process of commissioning and conducting forensic nonconventional examinations.
Highlights
The paper looks at some issues with how forensic examinations are classified
Analysis of scientific literature reveals that the diversity
emerging forensic science disciplines puts the questions of their classification at odds
Summary
The paper looks at some issues with how forensic examinations are classified, commissioned and conducted. Возникла необходимость в пересмотре классификации судебных экспертиз исходя из характера отраслей специальных знаний (в зависимости от класса, рода, вида и подвида), используемых при их производстве. Как показывает анализ литературы по теории судебной экспертизы и научных статей по данной проблематике [1,2,3], класс биологических экспертиз представлен в противоречии с пониманием биологии как комплексной науки о живых организмах.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
