Abstract

The study of rhomboid-shaped fully packed loop configurations (RFPLs) is inspired by the work of Fischer and Nadeau on triangular fully packed loop configurations (TFPLs). By using the same techniques as they did some nice combinatorics for RFPLs arise. To each RFPL and to each oriented RFPL a quadruple of binary words (α ,β ;γ ,δ ) – its so-called boundary – is assigned. There are necessary conditions for the boundary of an RFPL respectively an oriented RFPL. For instance, it has to fulfill the inequality $d(γ )+d(δ )\geq(α )+d(β )+\vert α \vert _0\vert β \vert _1$, where $\vert α \vert _i $ denotes the number of occurrences of $i=0,1$ in α and d(α ) denotes the number of inversions of α . Furthermore, the number of ordinary RFPLs with boundary (α ,β ;γ ,δ ) can be expressed in terms of oriented RFPLs with the same boundary. Finally, oriented RFPLs with boundary (α ,β ;γ ,δ ) such that $d(γ )+d(δ )=d(α )+d(β )+\vert α \vert _0\vert β \vert _1$ are considered. They are in bijection with rhomboid-shaped Knutson-Tao puzzles. Also, Littlewood-Richardson tableaux of defect d are defined. They can be understood as a generalization of Littlewood-Richardson tableaux. Those tableaux are in bijection with rhomboid-shaped Knutson-Tao puzzles.

Highlights

  • Packed loop configurations (FPLs) came up in statistical mechanics

  • Crucial in the development of triangular fully packed loop configurations (TFPLs) are Fully packed loop configurations (FPLs) corresponding to a link pattern with a large number of nested arches: they admit a combinatorial decomposition in which TFPLs naturally arise

  • Necessary conditions for the existence of TFPLs were shown in Caselli et al (2004), Fischer and Nadeau (2012) and Nadeau (2013a)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Packed loop configurations (FPLs) came up in statistical mechanics. Later, it turned out that they are in bijection with alternating sign matrices. Crucial in the development of triangular fully packed loop configurations (TFPLs) are FPLs corresponding to a link pattern with a large number of nested arches: they admit a combinatorial decomposition in which TFPLs naturally arise This came up in the course of the proof in Caselli et al (2004) of a conjecture in Zuber (2004). For oriented TFPLs a combinatorial interpretation of the difference d(w) − d(u) − d(v) is given in Fischer and Nadeau (2012) This point of view turned out fruitful: under the constraint that d(w) − d(u) − d(v) = 0 oriented TFPLs with boundary (u,v;w) are enumerated by the Littlewood-Richardson coefficient cλλ((wu)),λ(v) where λ(u) denotes the Young diagram corresponding to u. The number of zeroes after the last one in ω is denoted by |ω|0,|ω|1+1

Rhomboid-shaped fully packed loop configurations
Perfect matchings
Path tangles
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call