Abstract
Automated decisions, especially those that operate using AI, face accusations of being opaque black boxes. This accusation is to be taken seriously, but it is put into perspective to a certain extent if one contrasts it with the criticism of human-generated reasoning for decisions in the judiciary and administration. This article explains the functions that decision rationales fulfill from the perspective of legal scholarship and examines the qualities and shortcomings of human and machine approaches.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
