Abstract

Some aspects of rank ordering and scaling with paired comparisons data are examined. In terms of the mathematical concept “relation” the characterizing features of a “simple ordering” are set out to make explicit those properties which must be exhibited by paired comparisons data if the objects compared are to be rank orderable. Rank ordering is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for scaling. Cases arise where ordered elements are not scalable by Thurstone's procedures. It is argued that the Law of Comparative Judgement is only one of a number of possible scaling models for paired comparisons data; and an alternative is proposed which relates scale distance to the relative incidence of “error” in comparative judgement.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.