Abstract
The main objective of the research was the question of the responsibility for failure to decisions of constitutional justice authorities in the federal territories. The author considers the reasons of nonperformance of decisions of constitutional Justice authorities, discourses about types of responsibility. In the article the positive experience in this problem solving by improvement procuracy’s relations is discussed. The author suggests possible ways of solution for nonperformance of decisions of constitutional (statutory) courts in Russian federal territories. Also specific proposals focused on caution judicatum solvi-execution of the constitutional (statutory) courts’ decisions-are offered here.
Highlights
New Russian judicial system formation is one of the most important goals of the political-legal reforms nowadays
The author considers the reasons of nonperformance of decisions of constitutional Justice authorities, discourses about types of responsibility
Russian constitutional justice contributes to federalism development, supremacy guarantee both federal Constitution and constitutions of Russian territories, consolidation of legal space entity, legal protection and legal personal interests, advance of mechanism realization “control and balance”, when the court system may influence on decisions and acts of legislative and executive authorities, ‘balanced their’
Summary
New Russian judicial system formation is one of the most important goals of the political-legal reforms nowadays. The constitutional judicial authorities take the most important place in democratization of political system, in key reorganization of forms and methods of legal institute work, associated with legal defense and legal interests of citizens. In practice there are following types of nonperformance of decisions of constitutional control authorities at the regional level: 1) unjustified delaying in execution of decisions; 2) the formal and partial execution of decision; 3) the total nonperformance of decision. The examples of nonperformance decision of constitutional judicial authorities are met at the federal level. The key goal of the article was definition and solution of theoretical application problems, concerning the nonperformance of constitutional court (statutory) decisions. The question, concerning with nonperformance of constitutional justice authorities decisions, was the subject of the work of the following scientists: S. The choice of the theme of this research was destined by the urgency of an issue-its theoretical and practical importance, and insufficient elaboration in the scientific literature
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
