Some approaches to complementary product strategy

Abstract

Without complementary products, many high-tech innovations might be relegated to the scrap heap. For example, the development of desktop computers was not the sole impetus for the personal computing revolution. This innovation also depended on the development of word processing, spreadsheet, and desktop publishing software, as well as peripheral devices such as laser printers. Development of complementary products clearly offers increased opportunities for firms in many high-tech markets. However, managers must balance those opportunities with the added risks their firms face in attempting to develop products that may extend beyond their core lines of business. Focusing on the early business analysis stage of the product development process, Sanjit Sengupta identifies some alternative approaches that firms use for developing and marketing complementary products. Using data from 103 projects in the computer, consumer electronics, software, and communications industries, his study explores the relationships between a firm’s complementary product strategy and such conditions as complementary product opportunity, organizational fit, and the multiplier effect of the complementary product on sales of the primary product. His study also examines the sources of competitive advantage in complementary product strategies. Contrary to the notion that only large, well-funded firms can pursue a complementary product strategy, the study identifies various alternatives to expensive, in-house development efforts. Depending on the level of resources available for a particular project, a firm may choose various modes for adopting a complementary product strategy, including co-development alliances, proprietary interface development, co-marketing alliances, and original equipment manufacturer (OEM) agreements. Findings from this study indicate that competitive advantage in complementary product strategy comes from the multiplier effect on sales of the primary product and from the innovativeness of the complementary product. Even if the complementary product has low sales potential by itself, the product may still offer a significant competitive advantage through its multiplier effect on the sales of the primary product. Somewhat surprisingly, the results suggest that organizational fit and complementary product opportunity have no effect on competitive advantage. However, organizational fit does appear to be an important condition for adopting a complementary product strategy.