Abstract

Somatotype is the parameter used to determine the body composition. Our objective was to prove if there are somatotype divergences among metabolically healthy women and women with metabolic syndrome. Study included 100 obese women aged 28.09± 9.21 years with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and 100 healthy control women without MetS matched in age and BMI. Metabolic condition was evaluated according to International Diabetes Federation criteria (IDF), whilst somatotype was achieved via Heath-Carter method. There were notable variations in somatotype between the two groups. Women without metabolic syndrome had obviously higher ectomorph-mesomorph (p<0.03) mesomorph-endomorph (8.31-4.51-0.61) in comparison to women with metabolic syndrome showing higher endomorph-mesomorph 6.67-4.41-0.62. Significant positive correlation was found between HOMA-IR and endomorph component (p = 0.01) as well as between triglycerides and endomorph component in MetS group (p=0.01), but no difference was observed in those without. We concluded that endomorph is more dominant in metabolically obese women and mesomorph in group with MetS. Metabolic abnormalities are directly correlated with the 1 The obtained results imply the important role of the nonadipose components, presented by mesomorphy and ectomorphy, in the distinction between healthy and risky metabolic profile. This study expressed the need for somatotyping in MetS to deal with disease prevention.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.