Abstract
This note contributes to solving the Wallis–North paradox in transaction cost measurement. By distinguishing latent transaction costs from actual transaction costs, the note showed that when the latent transaction costs were prohibitively high, no transaction and actual transaction costs would happen and thus the share of transaction sectors should be zero; nevertheless, with latent transaction costs declining, transaction sectors and actual transaction costs will increase. Therefore, a higher share of transaction sectors in an economy reveals that the economy actually has a lower level of (latent) transaction costs. The Wallis–North approach is still workable for the transaction cost measurement but with an inverted interpretation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
