Abstract

Solving the Topographic Potential Bias as an Initial Value ProblemIf the gravitational potential or the disturbing potential of the Earth be downward continued by harmonic continuation inside the Earth's topography, it will be biased, the bias being the difference between the downward continued fictitious, harmonic potential and the real potential inside the masses. We use initial value problem techniques to solve for the bias. First, the solution is derived for a constant topographic density, in which case the bias can be expressed by a very simple formula related with the topographic height above the computation point. Second, for an arbitrary density distribution the bias becomes an integral along the vertical from the computation point to the Earth's surface. No topographic masses, except those along the vertical through the computation point, affect the bias. (To be exact, only the direct and indirect effects of an arbitrarily small but finite volume of mass around the surface point along the radius must be considered.) This implies that the frequently computed terrain effect is not needed (except, possibly, for an arbitrarily small inner-zone around the computation point) for computing the geoid by the method of analytical continuation.

Highlights

  • If we disregard or remove the effect of the atmosphere, the gravitational potential of the Earth is harmonic in the exterior of the Earth’s surface

  • In the present study the approach is different: we study the topographic bias as an initial value problem (IVP)

  • In the case of a constant topographic density we have shown that the topographic potential bias can be expressed by the simple formula of Eq (13)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

If we disregard or remove the effect of the atmosphere, the gravitational potential of the Earth is harmonic in the exterior of the Earth’s surface. Let us imagine that the disturbing potential (the gravity potential minus the normal potential) can be analytically continued to sea level, and that the topographic bias can be determined. By subtracting the bias from the analytically continued potential, the true disturbing potential at sea level is obtained, and the geoid height can be determined by applying Bruns’ theorem to the potential. This problem is studied as that of continuing a finite series of spherical harmonics, representing the external potential of the Earth, analytically to sea level This paper resulted in some critical remarks by Vermeer (2008), which were rather concerned with the analytical continuation error of the spherical harmonic series than with the topographic bias as pointed out by Sjöberg (2008). The concept of the topographic bias is important in determining the geoid from the external gravity field by the method of analytical continuation

BASIC FORMULAS
SOLUTION FOR A CONSTANT TOPOGRAPHIC DENSITY
THE TOPOGRAPHIC BIAS IN THE LIMITING CASE
SOLUTION FOR AN ARBITRARY TOPOGRAPHIC DENSITY DISTRIBUTION
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call