Abstract

Lithium ion battery electrodes were manufactured using a new, completely dry powder painting process. The solvents used for conventional slurry-cast electrodes have been completely removed. Thermal activation time has been greatly reduced due to the time and resource demanding solvent evaporation process needed with slurry-cast electrode manufacturing being replaced by a hot rolling process. It has been found that thermal activation time to induce mechanical bonding of the thermoplastic polymer to the remaining active electrode particles is only a few seconds. Removing the solvent and drying process allows large-scale Li-ion battery production to be more economically viable in markets such as automotive energy storage systems. By understanding the surface energies of various powders which govern the powder mixing and binder distribution, bonding tests of the dry-deposited particles onto the current collector show that the bonding strength is greater than slurry-cast electrodes, 148.8 kPa as compared to 84.3 kPa. Electrochemical tests show that the new electrodes outperform conventional slurry processed electrodes, which is due to different binder distribution.

Highlights

  • Lithium ion battery electrodes were manufactured using a new, completely dry powder painting process

  • Electrochemical tests show that the new electrodes outperform conventional slurry processed electrodes, which is due to different binder distribution

  • All designs show similar results, and we present the comparison between conventional slurry process with our proposed dry process for two designs (Design 1 and Design 4) here

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lithium ion battery electrodes were manufactured using a new, completely dry powder painting process. Based on the cost analysis shown, adopting the dry painting process can potentially save ~15% on labors, capital equipment and plant area in battery manufacturing This is due to the removal of large capital investments such as solvent recovery systems and the removal of time and energy consuming drying processes needed for the conventional method of manufacturing. This analysis was based on the Argonne battery performance and cost (BatPaC) model[28]. All designs show similar results, and we present the comparison between conventional slurry process with our proposed dry process for two designs (Design 1 and Design 4) here

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call