Abstract

The effect of the solvent on the electroreduction of ethylenediaminetetraacetatochromate(III) ([CrEDTA]−), cyclohexanediamine-tetraacetatochromate(III) ([CrCYDTA]−) and (2-hydroxyethyl)ethylenediaminetriacetato-chromium(III) ([CrHEDTRA]) has been investigated in different solvents on a mercury electrode using convolution potential sweep voltammetry. The observed electron transfer rate constant and the transfer coefficient have been corrected for double-layer effects. It has been shown that the formal potential for the reduction of all three complexes in a series of solvents is a linear function of the solvent acceptor number. The logarithm of the corrected standard rate constant for the EDTA and CYDTA complexes depends on the solvent acceptor number and the logarithm of the solvent's longitudinal relaxation time, whereas for [CrHEDTRA] it depends on the solvent's acceptor and donor numbers. It is concluded that, in the case of the EDTA and CYDTA complexes, no solvent molecules are incorporated as ligands in the first coordination sphere. However, in the HEDTRA complex the coordinated water molecule originally present is substituted by the solvent in which the reaction takes place.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.