Abstract

In the past, the determination of appropriate solvency levels for U.S. companies writing major property-liability insurance lines took a decidedly non-analytic approach. Verbal persuasion, reinforced by continual empirical observation, allowed for the dominance of the so-called Kenney Rules for the determination of an appropriate level of financial assets, relative to premiums written, as the required solvency level. For example, it would be assumed for regulatory purposes that if the ratio of assets to written premiums were normally 3/2 then policyholders could be assured of the payments of all their contractual claims.1

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.