Solute Fluxes Through Restored Prairie and Intensively Managed Critical Zones in Nebraska and Iowa

Ashlee L Dere,Sara K Parcher,Amy M Hemje,E Arthur Bettis,Courtney A Capalli,Andrew W Miller

doi:10.3389/feart.2019.00024

Ashlee L Dere, Sara K Parcher + Show 4 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00024

Copy DOI

Abstract

Agricultural activities in the Midwestern United States have potentially altered geochemical fluxes within the critical zone (CZ) compared to native prairie systems that previously dominated the region. To quantify the impact of agricultural land use on soil and stream solute behavior, we studied two watersheds in the region: Glacier Creek Preserve (GCP) in eastern Nebraska and the Intensively Managed Landscapes Critical Zone Observatory (IML-CZO) in eastern Iowa. Both watersheds were initially under agricultural land use for over 100 years, but part of each watershed was restored to prairie 20 – 50 years ago. Soils at both sites formed in thick loess (≥6 m) overlying glacial till with similar mean annual temperatures (~10 °C) but slightly higher mean annual precipitation in Iowa (89 cm) compared to Nebraska (78 cm). At both sites, soil pore water and precipitation were collected every two to four weeks to measure anions, cations, and alkalinity; stream waters draining either restored prairie or agriculture were sampled similarly in Nebraska. Both soil moisture content and electrical conductivity were consistently higher in the upper one meter of agricultural soils compared to prairie soils in Nebraska, implying slower drainage and higher solute concentrations in the agricultural soils. At both sites, soil pore water Ca+2 and Mg+2 concentrations and annual fluxes were significantly higher in agricultural soils compared to restored prairie. Conversely, streams draining restored prairie have significantly higher Ca+2 and Mg+2 concentrations than the agricultural streams. Fluxes from agricultural streams, however, were higher than the prairie, pointing to a potential dilution effect of runoff from the agricultural land use. These observations lead to a conceptual model where deeply infiltrating water in restored prairie soils interacts with minerals present deeper in the soil before reaching the stream whereas in agricultural soils water does not infiltrate as deeply and thus experiences more shallow flowpaths to the stream. Furthermore, changes in geochemical and hydrologic fluxes have been realized in just a few decades since switching land use from agriculture to prairie. Thus, intense agricultural land use may alter soil function and solute transport to streams compared to critical zones hosting tallgrass prairie vegetation.

Highlights

The Midwestern United States hosts an impressively thick critical zone (CZ), the layer of the Earth that encompasses groundwater to vegetation (Brantley et al, 2007), with loess deposits exceeding 40 m deep in some areas (Bettis et al, 2003)
Solute measurements in this study focused on cations (Na+, K+, Mg2+, and Ca2+) and anions (Cl−, NO2−, NO3−, SO42−, and PO43−) in precipitation, soil pore water, and stream water as well as some metals (Al3+, Fe2+, Fe3+, and Mn2+) in stream water
Using these geochemically relevant ion concentrations from the different water sample types, combined with soil and stream hydrologic characterization, we present an initial conceptual model demonstrating impacts of intensive agriculture and prairie land use on soil hydrology, geochemistry, and stream chemistry

Summary

Introduction

The Midwestern United States hosts an impressively thick critical zone (CZ), the layer of the Earth that encompasses groundwater to vegetation (Brantley et al, 2007), with loess deposits exceeding 40 m deep in some areas (Bettis et al, 2003). The region hosted extensive prairie vegetation, but the landscape has been largely converted to agricultural land use since the 1800s (Sampson and Knopf, 1994; Wright and Wimberly, 2013). Soils in this region sustain intensive agriculture, store large quantities of carbon, and filter water as it recharges groundwater and streams (Banwart, 2011), but how intensive agriculture influences CZ processes, including water and nutrient fluxes, and how long intensive land use can be maintained while sustaining high productivity, is unclear (Foley et al, 2005). Despite the agronomic and environmental importance of the Midwestern CZ (Richardson and Kumar, 2017), we still know little about how activities at the surface influence CZ processes such as soil water fluxes and chemistry that are linked to streams

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion