Abstract

The soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) is the principal regulator of epoxy fatty‐acids (EpFA) transforming them in to the less active diols. Inhibitors of sEH block this activity and maintain levels of EpFA in vivo which has demonstrated potent analgesia in several preclinical models of acute and chronic pain. However, sEH inhibitors have no observable action in the absence of a pain state [1]. It was therefore hypothesized that an additional factor was present in the painful state that was required for the antinociceptive action of the EpFA [2]. Investigation began with cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and experiments demonstrated this was active but also that increasing cAMP with phosphodiesterase inhibitors increased EpFA as well. Phosphodiesterase enzymes hydrolyze the cyclic nucleotide into adenosine monophosphate altering its secondary messenger capacity. This led to the design and synthesis of several dual inhibitors of sEH and phosphodiesterase.Multi‐target ligands are designed to improve safety and efficacy in treatment of diseases. The use of drug combinations cannot be assumed to be safe given drug‐drug interactions. Additionally, the prediction of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic relationships is less complicated with a single entity. The multi‐target ligands are selected to improve therapeutic efficacy by hitting multiple targets in physiological disorders. Thus, increasing the EpFA by halting their degradation and at the same time potentiating their activity with an increase in cAMP was the goal with synthesis of the dual inhibitor. We present the biochemical characterization as well as the in vivo efficacy in an inflammatory pain model for the selected dual inhibitor of sEH and PDE enzymes. The IC50 of RBH61 for sEH determined on the sEH human recombinant enzyme is 2.1 ± 0.5 nM. This is paired with a IC50 in the PDE assay of 8.1 ± 0.05 nM in human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells. Evaluation of the dual inhibitor in a model of inflammatory pain in rats demonstrates its antinociceptive efficacy.Support or Funding InformationThis work was supported, in part, by National Institutes of Health grants: NIEHS R01 ES002710 and NIEHS/Superfund Research Program P42 ES004699, NINDS U54 NS079202 and Grants NIEHS T32ES007059, NIH 5T32DC008072‐05 and 4T32HL086350‐09.This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call