Abstract

We explore a practical approach for designing ionization cooling channels with periodic solenoidal focusing. We examine the lattice characteristics in terms of the properties of the coils and the cell geometry. The peak magnetic field in the coils is an important engineering constraint in lattice design. We examine the dependence of the peak field, momentum passband locations, and the beta function on the coil parameters. We make a systematic examination of all allowed lattice configurations taking into account the symmetry properties of the current densities and the beta function. We introduce a unique classification for comparing cooling lattice configurations. While solutions with a single coil per cell illustrate most of the effects that are important for cooling channel design, the introduction of additional coils allows more flexibility in selecting the lattice properties. We look at example solutions for the problem of the initial transverse cooling stage of a neutrino factory or muon collider and compare our results with the properties of some published cooling lattice designs. Scaling laws are used to compare solutions from different symmetry classes.

Highlights

  • Ionization cooling [1,2] is an essential feature of most designs for neutrino factories [3] and muon colliders [4].The phase space of the muon beam that comes from pion decays greatly exceeds the acceptance of downstream accelerator systems, so a cooling channel is usually included to reduce the transverse emittance

  • The beam is passed through an rf cavity that only restores the lost longitudinal momentum

  • Solenoid lattice design has traditionally been done by varying the parameters of a few coils at the boundary between lattice cells, such that beta function is preserved over a range of incident momentum values

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Ionization cooling [1,2] is an essential feature of most designs for neutrino factories [3] and muon colliders [4]. Later, following a suggestion by Andrew Sessler, it was found that the performance of these lattices could be improved significantly by the addition of higher harmonic terms to the on-axis fields [6] Lattices of this type were given the name ‘‘super-FOFO’’ or ‘‘SFOFO.’’ By changing the coil configurations and symmetry properties a number of periodic lattice configurations were discovered. A step beyond this was made by Penn [9,10], who examined periodic solenoidal lattices in terms of the addition of second and third harmonics to the fundamental sinusoidal field This analysis introduced a scaling variable Bp0 , where B0 is the peak on-axis field, is the period of the magnetic field, and p is the momentum of the particle. We examine the changes that are introduced as additional coils are added to the cell

IONIZATION COOLING LATTICES
Properties of cooling lattices
PERIODIC SOLENOID LATTICES
Mathieu analysis
Symplectic integrator method
Peak field
LATTICES WITH ONE SOLENOID PER CELL t
Representative lattices
Sinusoidal field approximation p
Lattice properties
Location of the momentum passbands
Beta function
Peak field enhancement
LATTICES WITH TWO SOLENOIDS PER CELL
Thin lens matrix analysis
LATTICES WITH THREE SOLENOIDS PER
VIII. SCALING RELATIONS
SUMMARY
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.