Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence captures photosynthetic phenology better than traditional vegetation indices

Abstract

Accurate characterization of plant phenology is of great importance for monitoring global carbon, water, and energy cycling. Remotely sensed satellite observations have been widely used to estimate land surface phenology across multiple spatial scales in the last three decades. Recent development on satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) observations have opened an opportunity to monitor the seasonality of plant growth from the perspective of photosynthesis phenology. The SIF observations from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) with high spatial resolution (up to 7 km × 3.5 km pixels) and near-daily global coverage provide unprecedented opportunity to observe photosynthetic and land surface phenology from space. However, the performance of TROPOMI SIF-derived phenology has not been systematically evaluated. In this study, we used flux tower gross primary productivity (GPP) and PhenoCam green chromatic coordinate (Gcc) data as the benchmark to verify phenology metrics derived from satellite observations. The phenology metrics including the start (SOS), end (EOS), length of growing season (LOS), and the peak of growing season (POS) were estimated from TROPOMI SIF, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), enhanced vegetation index (EVI), near‐infrared reflectance of vegetation (NIRv), and Global Vegetation Phenology product (MCD12Q2), and the latter four were obtained from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) across six vegetation types over North America during the period of 2018–2020. We found that the overall agreements of SIF (R2 ranging from 0.30 to 0.63) against GPP-estimated phenology were stronger than NDVI (0.17–0.41), EVI (0.19–0.39), NIRv (0.23–0.62), and MCD12Q2 (0.19–0.48) derived phenological events. In reference to GPP and Gcc-estimated phenology, SIF also generally has the least error and bias compared to other satellite remote sensing-derived phenology metrics. No significant differences were found between SIF and GPP-derived phenology (P>0.05, two-tailed t-test). In addition, we found that the spatial distribution of SIF-derived phenology reflected the expected latitudinal patterns in phenology dates. SOS, EOS, LOS, and POS observed by MCD12Q2 appeared to be earlier, later, longer, and earlier than TROPOMI SIF-derived phenology, respectively. SIF-based phenological transition dates more closely tracked GPP-based phenology dates, indicating TROPOMI SIF could be a great measure to track photosynthesis seasonality and land surface phenology.