Abstract

Context.A recent review shows that observations performed with different telescopes, spectral lines, and interpretation methods all agree about a vertical magnetic field gradient in solar active regions on the order of 3 G km−1, when a horizontal magnetic field gradient of only 0.3 G km−1is found. This represents an inexplicable discrepancy with respect to the divB = 0 law.Aims.The objective of this paper is to explain these observations through the lawB = μ0(H+M) in magnetized media.Methods.Magnetization is due to plasma diamagnetism, which results from the spiral motion of free electrons or charges about the magnetic field. Their usual photospheric densities lead to very weak magnetizationM, four orders of magnitude lower thanH. It is then assumed that electrons escape from the solar interior, where their thermal velocity is much higher than the escape velocity, in spite of the effect of protons. They escape from lower layers in a quasi-static spreading, and accumulate in the photosphere. By evaluating the magnetic energy of an elementary atom embedded in the magnetized medium obeying the macroscopic lawB = μ0(H+M), it is shown that the Zeeman Hamiltonian is due to the effect ofH. Thus, what is measured isH.Results.The decrease in density with height is responsible for non-zero divergence ofM, which is compensated for by the divergence ofH, in order to ensure div B = 0. The behavior of the observed quantities is recovered.Conclusions.The problem of the divergence of the observed magnetic field in solar active regions finally reveals evidence of electron accumulation in the solar photosphere. This is not the case of the heavier protons, which remain in lower layers. An electric field would thus be present in the solar interior, but as the total charge remains negligible, no electric field or effect would result outside the star.

Highlights

  • The problem of the large magnitude difference between the observed horizontal and vertical magnetic field gradients in and around sunspots has been known for a long time

  • Balthasar (2018) wrote a detailed review of observations, where it is shown that typical values of 3 G km−1 and 0.3 G km−1 are obtained for the vertical and horizontal gradients of the magnetic field, respectively, regardless of the telescope, spectral line(s), and measurement interpretation method used

  • For the observed horizontal gradient, its order of magnitude of 0.3 G km−1 is fully compatible with the typical sunspot diameter (10 000 km) and the typical horizontal field component in the penumbra (1500 G), which reverses from one side of the sunspot to the opposite side

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The problem of the large magnitude difference between the observed horizontal and vertical magnetic field gradients in and around sunspots has been known for a long time. Balthasar (2018) wrote a detailed review of observations, where it is shown that typical values of 3 G km−1 and 0.3 G km−1 are obtained for the vertical and horizontal gradients of the magnetic field, respectively, regardless of the telescope, spectral line(s), and measurement interpretation method used. Balthasar (2018) wrote a detailed review of observations, where it is shown that typical values of 3 G km−1 and 0.3 G km−1 are obtained for the vertical and horizontal gradients of the magnetic field, respectively, regardless of the telescope, spectral line(s), and measurement interpretation method used. In this paper we explain the observations by applying the Maxwell relation in magnetized media B = μ0 (H + M), provided that it can be proved that what is measured by the Zeeman effect is H and not B We find it interesting to publish here the histograms of magnetic inaccuracy obtained within the UNNOFIT inversion method that we recently developed (Bommier et al 2007), in magnetic field cartesian coordinates As the field strength there is on the order of one thousand gauss, with a difference of about 300 G between the two line

Some mathematical theorems
Theorem 1: filtering and derivation commute
Derivatives and finite differences
Theorem 2: the content of the non-zero average
Magnetic field produced by the conduction currents
Magnetic masses
The Zeeman Hamiltonian
Demonstration 1: via magnetic masses
Demonstration 2: via magnetization currents
Demonstration 3: from the magnetic potential energy
Concluding remarks about the Zeeman Hamiltonian
Electron accumulation at the surface of the Sun
Escape velocity from gravity
Thermal escape
Escape velocity from one proton
Escape velocity from several protons
Spreading time
Surface electron density
Electron density measurements in the solar photosphere
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call