Abstract

The present work investigated the performance of an isotropic (Liu–Jordan, L–J) and an anisotropic (Hay) model in assessing the solar energy potential of Saudi Arabia. Three types of solar collectors were considered: with southward fixed-tilt (mode (i)), with fixed-tilt tracking the Sun (mode (ii)), and with varying-tilt tracking the Sun (mode (iii)). This was the first time such a study was conducted for Saudi Arabia. The average annual difference between anisotropic (Hay) and isotropic (L–J) estimates is least ≈38 kWhm−2 year−1 over Saudi Arabia for mode (i), and therefore, the L–J model can be used effectively. In modes (ii) and (iii), the difference is greater (≈197 and ≈226 kWhm−2 year−1, respectively). It is, then, up to the solar energy engineer to decide which model is to be used, but it is recommended that the Hay model be utilised for mode-(iii) solar collectors. These results fill a research gap about the suitability of models in practice. An interesting feature for the ratio of the annual mean solar energy yield of Hay over L–J as function of the latitude, φ, and the ground albedo, ρr, is the formation of a “well” for 29° ≤ φ ≤ 31° and 1.15 ≤ ρr ≤ 1.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.