Abstract

Solar energetic particle (SEP) events are known to occur following solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). However, some high-energy solar events do not result in SEPs being detected at Earth, and it is these types of event which may be termed “false alarms”.We define two simple SEP forecasting algorithms based upon the occurrence of a magnetically well-connected CME with a speed in excess of 1500~mbox{km},mbox{s}^{-1} (a “fast” CME) or a well-connected X-class flare and analyse them with respect to historical datasets. We compare the parameters of those solar events which produced an enhancement of {>},40~mbox{MeV} protons at Earth (an “SEP event”) and the parameters of false alarms.We find that an SEP forecasting algorithm based solely upon the occurrence of a well-connected fast CME produces fewer false alarms (28.8%) than an algorithm which is based solely upon a well-connected X-class flare (50.6%). Both algorithms fail to forecast a relatively high percentage of SEP events (53.2% and 50.6%, respectively).Our analysis of the historical datasets shows that false-alarm X-class flares were either not associated with any CME, or were associated with a CME slower than 500~mbox{km},mbox{s}^{-1}; false-alarm fast CMEs tended to be associated with flare classes lower than M3.A better approach to forecasting would be an algorithm which takes as its base the occurrence of both CMEs and flares. We define a new forecasting algorithm which uses a combination of CME and flare parameters, and we show that the false-alarm ratio is similar to that for the algorithm based upon fast CMEs (29.6%), but the percentage of SEP events not forecast is reduced to 32.4%.Lists of the solar events which gave rise to {>},40~mbox{MeV} protons and the false alarms have been derived and are made available to aid further study.

Highlights

  • Solar energetic particles (SEPs) pose a significant radiation hazard to humans in space (Hoff, Townsend, and Zapp, 2004) and in high-flying aircraft, at high latitudes (Beck et al, 2005)

  • We define a new forecasting algorithm which uses a combination of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and flare parameters, and we show that the false-alarm ratio is similar to that for the algorithm based upon fast CMEs (29.6%), but the percentage of SEP events not forecast is reduced to 32.4%

  • We have used historical datasets in order to assess the efficacy of two simple SEP forecasting algorithms which were based upon the occurrence of magnetically well-connected energetic solar events: western fast CMEs and X-class flares

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Solar energetic particles (SEPs) pose a significant radiation hazard to humans in space (Hoff, Townsend, and Zapp, 2004) and in high-flying aircraft, at high latitudes (Beck et al, 2005). The proton prediction system proposed by Smart and Shea (1989) makes a forecast based upon flare intensity and position It produces almost equal numbers of correct forecasts, false alarms, and missed events (Kahler, Cliver, and Ling, 2007). Laurenza et al (2009) developed the empirical model for solar proton events real-time alert (ESPERTA) method of SEP forecasting based upon flare size, flare location, and evidence of particle acceleration and escape Their emphasis was to maximise the time between the issue of an SEP event warning and the arrival of the particles, and their aim was to produce an automated forecasting tool with a view to issuing warnings of SEP events without human intervention.

False Alarms and Forecasting Algorithms
Solar Event Parameters
Location Criterion for Solar Events
The Forecasting Algorithms
SEP Event Parameters
Association of Solar Events and SEP Events
Identification of False Alarms and Evaluation of the Forecasting Algorithms
Improvement of the Forecasting Algorithms
Findings
Summary and Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call