Abstract
Solar assisted Photo Fenton was compared with advanced oxidation processes for their color and COD removal efficiency and cost effectiveness. H2O2 alone appeared to be inefficient to reduce color and COD content of any effluent. The performance of Fenton process was slightly better, color and COD removals were 45 % and 63% respectively. Photo Fenton treatment of blue effluent resulted into color and COD removal of 56 % and 66 % respectively. In case of black effluent, the removal of these parameters was 39 % and 84% respectively. However, application of solar radiation (18 hours) resulted in substantial color and COD removal (i.e. 52 % and 88 % respectively for black effluent and 61 % and 85 %, respectively for blue effluent). Solar assisted photo Fenton proved as the most energy and cost effective (100 to 150 times less as compared to UV/Fe/H2O2 and O3 ) process among all AOPs, although ozone completely decolorized the effluent and showed more than 87% COD removal in an alkaline medium (pH 9) but at very high cost. The electrical energy requirements of the tested processes followed the increasing order UV/Fe/H2O2 < O3 < H2O2< Fe/H2O2< Solar/ Fe/H2O2.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
