Abstract

AbstractMetacommunity theory proposes that a collection of local communities are linked by dispersal and the resulting compositions are a product of both niche‐based (species sorting) and spatial processes. Determining which of these factors is most important in different habitats can provide insight into the regulation of community assembly. To date, the metacommunity organization of heterotrophic soil bacteria is largely unknown. Spatial variation of soil bacterial communities could arise from (1) the resource heterogeneity produced by plant communities through root exudation and/or litter inputs; (2) the heterogeneity of soil environmental properties; and (3) pure spatial processes, including dispersal limitation and stochastic assembly. Understanding the relative importance of these factors for soil bacterial community structure and function could increase our ability to restore soil communities. We utilized an ongoing tallgrass prairie restoration experiment in northeastern Kansas to assess if restoring native plant communities produced changes in bacterial communities 6 years after restoration. We further examined the relative importance of the spatial heterogeneity of plant communities, soil properties, and pure spatial effects for bacterial community structure in the old‐field restoration site. We found that soil bacterial communities were not influenced by plant restoration, but rather, by the local heterogeneity of soil environmental properties (16.9% of bacterial community variation) and pure spatial effects (11.1%). This work also stresses the idea that restoring bacterial communities can take many years to accomplish due to the inherent changes that occur to the soil after cultivation and the time it takes for the re‐establishment of soil quality.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call